Thank you for following the work of the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project. We’ll continue looking at the issues of election reform at AEI and Brookings. For new work on congressional redistricting, please visit www.redistrictingproject.org.

McCain v. Obama: A Hypothetical Supreme Court Case
October 20, 2008
Monday, October 20, 2008
10:00 AM-12:00 PM
Hart Auditorium, McDonough Hall
Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

To read the decision in the case, go here (PDF).

To watch a video of the event, or listen to audio from the event, go here.

To read a transcript of the event, go here (PDF).

Is another Bush v. Gore possible? What if the U.S. Supreme Court held the fate of another presidential election in its hands?

It's November 4, 2008. A blizzard hits Colorado gridlocking Denver traffic and impeding access to the polls. Denver's Democratic Election Director, with consent of the Democratic Mayor, announces an extension of polling hours for two extra hours. The Republican Secretary of State seeks an injunction in Court against the extension arguing it has no basis in law and that it is unfair to extend polling places only in Denver, but not statewide.

His immediate request is denied, but the ballots cast after 7:00 pm are cast as provisional ballots, and these ballots will not be opened until the matter is settled in court. After several appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court hears the case of McCain v. Obama. In 2008, Colorado is the deciding state in the Electoral College. If these ballots are counted, it is likely Obama will win the election, if not, McCain will be the next president.

On October 20, the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project, along with the Election Law @ Moritz project at the Ohio State University and the Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court Institute will co-sponsor an argument of this hypothetical court case. Respected Supreme Court advocates Walter Dellinger and Glen Nager will argue before a balanced panel of retired judges David Levi, Thomas Phillips, and Patricia Wald. The advocates will each have 30 minutes to argue their case and audience questions and discussion will follow with a court opinion to be issued within ten days.

Moderators:
Edward B. Foley, Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University
John C. Fortier, AEI

Chief Justice:
David F. Levi, Duke Law School, former Chief Judge, US District Court, Eastern District California

Associate Justices:
Thomas R. Phillips, Baker Botts, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas
Patricia M. Wald, former Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Arguing on Behalf of McCain:
Glen D. Nager, Jones Day

Arguing on Behalf of Obama:
Walter Dellinger, O'Melveny & Myers
Featured Resources
This report provides the results from an evaluation of five projects to improve election data collection in 2008. Overall, the grantees increased their level of core data collection, improving to 80 percent of the core data from less than half in 2006.
The Ohio Secretary of State conducted this legislative analysis of House Bill 260, the election enhancements bill introduced by State Representatives Dan Stewart and Tracy Heard.
Although the Senate recount in Minnesota resulted in a winner, questions still remained regarding the classification of unopened, rejected absentee ballots. A district court concluded that these ballots are public data and that the plaintiffs, state television news organizations, may view them.
Although states are continuing to pass laws and reach decisions to comply with the mandates of HAVA and related laws, Daniel Tokaji argues that the United States still lacks a well-functioning independent electoral management body.
In this analysis, the Election Reform Project’s Molly Reynolds looks at what responses from a 2008 survey can tell us about what the public prefers in terms of election reform proposals—and the limits of relying on such data in this particular area.
Research Projects
Project Vote is a national nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) that works to empower, educate, and mobilize low-income, minority, youth, and other marginalized and under-represented voters.
electionline.org provides daily news updates on election reform issues, as well as deeper analysis of selected topics, including recent reports on voter registration, recount procedures, and the progress in implementing the Help America Vote Act since 2002.
Dēmos is a non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization founded in 2000. A multi-issue national organization, Dēmoscombines research, policy development, and advocacy to influence public debates and catalyze change.
FairVote develops and promotes practical strategies to improve elections at the local, state and national levels.
Election Law @ Moritz, run through Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, contains both explanation and commentary on a wealth of election reform issues from a legal perspective.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2010, AEI
and The Brookings Institution