Thank you for following the work of the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project. We’ll continue looking at the issues of election reform at AEI and Brookings. For new work on congressional redistricting, please visit www.redistrictingproject.org.

McCain v. Obama: A Hypothetical Supreme Court Case
October 20, 2008
Monday, October 20, 2008
10:00 AM-12:00 PM
Hart Auditorium, McDonough Hall
Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

To read the decision in the case, go here (PDF).

To watch a video of the event, or listen to audio from the event, go here.

To read a transcript of the event, go here (PDF).

Is another Bush v. Gore possible? What if the U.S. Supreme Court held the fate of another presidential election in its hands?

It's November 4, 2008. A blizzard hits Colorado gridlocking Denver traffic and impeding access to the polls. Denver's Democratic Election Director, with consent of the Democratic Mayor, announces an extension of polling hours for two extra hours. The Republican Secretary of State seeks an injunction in Court against the extension arguing it has no basis in law and that it is unfair to extend polling places only in Denver, but not statewide.

His immediate request is denied, but the ballots cast after 7:00 pm are cast as provisional ballots, and these ballots will not be opened until the matter is settled in court. After several appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court hears the case of McCain v. Obama. In 2008, Colorado is the deciding state in the Electoral College. If these ballots are counted, it is likely Obama will win the election, if not, McCain will be the next president.

On October 20, the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project, along with the Election Law @ Moritz project at the Ohio State University and the Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court Institute will co-sponsor an argument of this hypothetical court case. Respected Supreme Court advocates Walter Dellinger and Glen Nager will argue before a balanced panel of retired judges David Levi, Thomas Phillips, and Patricia Wald. The advocates will each have 30 minutes to argue their case and audience questions and discussion will follow with a court opinion to be issued within ten days.

Moderators:
Edward B. Foley, Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University
John C. Fortier, AEI

Chief Justice:
David F. Levi, Duke Law School, former Chief Judge, US District Court, Eastern District California

Associate Justices:
Thomas R. Phillips, Baker Botts, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas
Patricia M. Wald, former Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Arguing on Behalf of McCain:
Glen D. Nager, Jones Day

Arguing on Behalf of Obama:
Walter Dellinger, O'Melveny & Myers
Featured Resources
This article explores the constitutionality of poll watcher statutes, arguing that laws permitting their presence at voting locations are permissible under the U.S. Constitution.
In response to a request by the Election Commission, the Hawaii Office of Elections produced this report outlining the plan for the 2010 elections. A focus of this report is the effect of the reduced budget for the office on staffing and the number of precincts which will be open for the elections.
Ned Foley’s post on Election Law @ Moritz delves into the issue of uncounted ballots. This category includes absentee ballots either wrongly rejected or arriving late (usually from overseas) and provisional ballots that haven’t yet been evaluated.
Post-election audits determine whether discrepancies between hand and machine ballot counts exist. Analysis of the 2008 election results in Connecticut find discrepancies in the vote counts caused by hand counting errors or vote misallocation, not as a result of machine tabulations.
This article explores the ways that various states distribute authority for the purchase of new voting technology, and argues that the procurement process can be improved through cooperation and shared responsibility.
Research Projects
Part of the Institute for Governmental Studies at the University of California at Berkeley, the Election Administration Research Center (EARC) aims to improve the administration of elections.
FairVote develops and promotes practical strategies to improve elections at the local, state and national levels.
Project Vote is a national nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) that works to empower, educate, and mobilize low-income, minority, youth, and other marginalized and under-represented voters.
Dēmos is a non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization founded in 2000. A multi-issue national organization, Dēmoscombines research, policy development, and advocacy to influence public debates and catalyze change.
The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2012, AEI
and The Brookings Institution