Auditing a State’s Laws for Resolving Election Contests
State laws on how to handle a dispute over the outcome of an election vary widely. The rules and procedures are often ambiguous, making resolution even more difficult. In a new essay, Edward Foley argues for the use of periodic “Election Law Contest Audits” as a way to alleviate this problem and improve the administration of elections.

Read the analysis here.
Featured Resources
On July 13, the Election Assistance Commission held a public meeting to hear testimony on issues of polling place signage and ballot design from advocates and state officials.
In this piece, staff from the Election Reform Project review the current state of play in the election reform research field.
Alvarez and Hall examine difficulties one encounters when using the EAC's Election Day Survey data and recommend strategies for improved data collection in future surveys.
Research Projects
Election Law @ Moritz, run through Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, contains both explanation and commentary on a wealth of election reform issues from a legal perspective.
Part of the Institute for Governmental Studies at the University of California at Berkeley, the Election Administration Research Center (EARC) aims to improve the administration of elections.
Electionline.org provides daily news updates on election reform issues, as well as deeper analysis of selected topics, including recent reports on voter registration, recount procedures, and the progress in implementing the Help America Vote Act since 2002.
As part of its broader research focus on elections, campaign ethics, campaign finance, and the legislative process, the Center for American Politics and Citizenship at the University of Maryland is engaged in research projects on voting technology and ballot design specifically.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2006, AEI
and The Brookings Institution