AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project:
The 2006 Elections-Are We Ready?

View the agenda for the event.
Watch a webcast, read the transcript, and view panelist presentations from the event here.

Event Recap

On September 22, 2006, the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project welcomed Representative Rush Holt (D-NJ) as the keynote speaker for an event entitled, “The 2006 Elections—Are We Ready?” Representative Holt emphasized that new voting technologies being adopted in accordance with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) need to be both auditable and actually audited. He also discussed legislation he introduced, The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, which would advance this goal by requiring all direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines to have a voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT).

Following Representative Holt’s address, Norman J. Ornstein of AEI, moderated a panel featuring perspectives from engineering, computer science, and political science entitled “Progress and Pitfalls in Voting Technology.” Presenter Steven Hertzberg of the Election Science Institute discussed his organization’s study of the May 2006 primary in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The panel’s second presenter, Michael Shamos of the Institute for Software Research at Carnegie Mellon University, tackled the issue of what voting method is “best” by rating different voting schemes on a one-to-ten scale for each of five categories: security, secrecy, accessibility, usability, and reliability. To conclude the panel, Charles Stewart III of MIT addressed the issue of “found votes,” or those the voters intend to cast but that, for a variety of reasons, never make it into the final, official count.

The event’s second panel, “HAVA: What Has Been Done? What Remains to Do?,” moderated by Thomas E. Mann of the Brookings Institution, focused on the human side of readiness for the November elections. Vermont Secretary of State Deborah Markowitz delivered an optimistic forecast for the administration of elections this November and emphasized the success that her state has had with allowing observers from both major political parties to participate at each step in the voting process. Donetta L. Davidson, a member of the United States Election Assistance Commission, highlighted the role the EAC has played since its creation under HAVA and discussed several steps it will be taking in the near future to further improve election administration. The focus of the panel shifted to legal concerns as Edward P. Foley, professor of law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, discussed the potential for significant litigation surrounding this fall’s elections. Finally, R. Doug Lewis, executive director of the Election Center, laid out a number of potential sources of problems for election administration, including with poll workers, databases, new equipment, and ballot delivery.
Featured Resources
In this analysis, Daniel Tokaji examines a controversy in Wisconsin related to its new statewide voter registration database, and highlights several problems that could occur nationwide this November.
This paper explores the determinants of early voting, finding a number of expected trends: early voters are older, better educated, and more cognitively engaged in the campaign and in politics.
Some of HAVA’s provisions faced an early test during the 2004 general election. In a recent study, the U.S. Government Accountability Office explored the law's implementation and the challenges faced by election officials.

Read the report.

Electionline.org’s survey of state election directors shows that most states use 'top down' rather than 'bottom up' lists; that states differ over producing the lists 'in house' or outsourcing the work; and that most states conduct registration purges in localities instead of at the state level.
Stewart III’s working paper examines the decrease in the residual vote rate between the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections and attributes it to better voting machines, as well as non-technology factors, including improved administrative practices and fewer voter abstentions
Research Projects
Election Law @ Moritz, run through Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, contains both explanation and commentary on a wealth of election reform issues from a legal perspective.
As part of its broader research focus on elections, campaign ethics, campaign finance, and the legislative process, the Center for American Politics and Citizenship at the University of Maryland is engaged in research projects on voting technology and ballot design specifically.
This project aims to evaluate the current state of reliability and uniformity of U.S. voting systems; to establish uniform attributes and quantitative guidelines for performance and reliability of voting systems; and to propose specific uniform guidelines and requirements for reliable voting systems
Directed by early voting scholar Paul Gronke and housed at Reed College, the Early Voting Information Center provides news and research on and a state-by-state overview of early voting issues.
Part of the Institute for Governmental Studies at the University of California at Berkeley, the Election Administration Research Center (EARC) aims to improve the administration of elections.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2006, AEI
and The Brookings Institution