AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project:
The 2006 Elections-Are We Ready?

View the agenda for the event.
Watch a webcast, read the transcript, and view panelist presentations from the event here.

Event Recap

On September 22, 2006, the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project welcomed Representative Rush Holt (D-NJ) as the keynote speaker for an event entitled, “The 2006 Elections—Are We Ready?” Representative Holt emphasized that new voting technologies being adopted in accordance with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) need to be both auditable and actually audited. He also discussed legislation he introduced, The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, which would advance this goal by requiring all direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines to have a voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT).

Following Representative Holt’s address, Norman J. Ornstein of AEI, moderated a panel featuring perspectives from engineering, computer science, and political science entitled “Progress and Pitfalls in Voting Technology.” Presenter Steven Hertzberg of the Election Science Institute discussed his organization’s study of the May 2006 primary in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The panel’s second presenter, Michael Shamos of the Institute for Software Research at Carnegie Mellon University, tackled the issue of what voting method is “best” by rating different voting schemes on a one-to-ten scale for each of five categories: security, secrecy, accessibility, usability, and reliability. To conclude the panel, Charles Stewart III of MIT addressed the issue of “found votes,” or those the voters intend to cast but that, for a variety of reasons, never make it into the final, official count.

The event’s second panel, “HAVA: What Has Been Done? What Remains to Do?,” moderated by Thomas E. Mann of the Brookings Institution, focused on the human side of readiness for the November elections. Vermont Secretary of State Deborah Markowitz delivered an optimistic forecast for the administration of elections this November and emphasized the success that her state has had with allowing observers from both major political parties to participate at each step in the voting process. Donetta L. Davidson, a member of the United States Election Assistance Commission, highlighted the role the EAC has played since its creation under HAVA and discussed several steps it will be taking in the near future to further improve election administration. The focus of the panel shifted to legal concerns as Edward P. Foley, professor of law at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, discussed the potential for significant litigation surrounding this fall’s elections. Finally, R. Doug Lewis, executive director of the Election Center, laid out a number of potential sources of problems for election administration, including with poll workers, databases, new equipment, and ballot delivery.
Featured Resources
The security risks inherent in internet-based voting today pose significant barriers to the adoption of this method in nationwide elections. The author suggests changes to both internet security and the allocation of election tasks to improve the applicability of the internet in elections.
In a survey conducted with public assistance agencies in 40 states and the District of Columbia, Dēmos asked about the feasibility of implementing an upgrade of voter registration databases based upon the records kept by these agencies.
Exploring the ways in which technology can be better utilized to improve the accuracy of voter registration databases can provide valuable guidance. Researchers undertook a pilot project to determine the feasibility of using database matching to identify voters in Oregon and Washington.
This report explores a range of dimensions of turnout in the 2008 election, including the relationship between early voting and election day registration and individuals going to the polls.
As election officials continue to prepare for the November midterm elections, Project Vote has assembled comprehensive recommendations to improve election administration in 11 states.
Research Projects
The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice.
electionline.org provides daily news updates on election reform issues, as well as deeper analysis of selected topics, including recent reports on voter registration, recount procedures, and the progress in implementing the Help America Vote Act since 2002.
Directed by early voting scholar Paul Gronke and housed at Reed College, the Early Voting Information Center provides news and research on and a state-by-state overview of early voting issues.
The mission of the VoTeR center is to advise state agencies in the use of voting technologies and to investigate voting solutions and voting equipment to develop and recommend safe use procedures for their usage in elections.
Project Vote is a national nonpartisan, nonprofit 501(c)(3) that works to empower, educate, and mobilize low-income, minority, youth, and other marginalized and under-represented voters.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2010, AEI
and The Brookings Institution