Voter Confidence in Context and the Effect of Winning (PDF)
Measures of voter confidence are often used by election reform researchers as part of their efforts to determine whether election administration systems are operating well. In a new report from the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, Morgan Llewellyn, Thad Hall, and R. Michael Alvarez examine the determinants of faith in the process, and find that support for a winning candidate and access to a voter verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) both lead to higher levels of confidence.

Read the report here (PDF).
Featured Resources
This paper summarizes a number of different studies on the usability of electronic voting systems, showing that, by and large, such systems work well.
This testimony, by the chair of the committee charged with making recommendations to the EAC about voting technology, summarizes likely changes to voting technology standards.
Stewart III’s working paper examines the decrease in the residual vote rate between the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections and attributes it to better voting machines, as well as non-technology factors, including improved administrative practices and fewer voter abstentions
On August 2, 2007, EAC Chair Donetta Davidson and Vice-Chair Rosemary Rodriguez testified before Congress on issues related to oversight of their agency.
This study evaluates the experience of both voters and election officials with a voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) pilot program in three Georgia counties during the 2006 election.
Research Projects
Election Law @ Moritz, run through Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, contains both explanation and commentary on a wealth of election reform issues from a legal perspective.
Electionline.org provides daily news updates on election reform issues, as well as deeper analysis of selected topics, including recent reports on voter registration, recount procedures, and the progress in implementing the Help America Vote Act since 2002.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2006, AEI
and The Brookings Institution