An Alternative Approach to Estimating Who Is Most Likely to Respond to Changes in Registration Laws (PDF)
As state legislatures across the country continue to consider implementing Election Day registration, a new paper asks a key question: which populations are most likely to experience gains in turnout as a result of registration reform? The results, reached using an innovative statistical technique, suggest that conventional assumptions about EDR may require a second look.

Read the paper here (PDF).
Featured Resources
This Century Foundation study explores various proposals to increase voter turnout, including Election Day registration, making Election Day a national holiday, and provisional ballot reform.
The National Voter Registration Act requires states to offer voter registration forms at public assistance agencies, and this report examines five states (North Carolina, Michigan, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Missouri) that have had exceptional success in implementing this policy.
This report examines Election Day Registration (EDR), which is often offered as a way to increase voter turnout. Contrasting Montana's EDR program (which was new in 2006) with Minnesota's (which has been in place for more than 30 years), the authors examine potential promises and pitfalls of EDR.
This resource, framed around ten general issue areas, examines which states are likely to experience different election administration problems in November.
Research Projects
Election Law @ Moritz, run through Moritz College of Law at the Ohio State University, contains both explanation and commentary on a wealth of election reform issues from a legal perspective.
Electionline.org provides daily news updates on election reform issues, as well as deeper analysis of selected topics, including recent reports on voter registration, recount procedures, and the progress in implementing the Help America Vote Act since 2002.
The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
www.aei.org
The Brookings Institution
www.brookings.edu
© Copyright 2006, AEI
and The Brookings Institution